BSMS Annual Implementation Report Home | Contents | User guide | Downloads
 




4 Valley report

This chapter examines salinity management at the valley and catchment level. Primary responsibility for catchment management lies with the Initiative’s partner agencies. The jurisdictional partners implement Programs of Action to address salinity within catchments.

Under the BSMS, the Commission and partner agencies cooperate to strengthen accountability for the salinity effects of within-valley actions, including monitoring and reporting. A key element is the introduction of salinity targets located at selected end-of-valley sites.

4.1 Overall valley management

Overview

End-of-valley targets are not an end in themselves. They are used because rivers integrate salinity, transporting salt-laden water through and out of, the catchments. The targets help to assess the health of the catchment, provide a basis to identify the benefits to downstream users and assist in the achievement of the overall Basin targets.

End-of-valley targets

Target sites are chosen to provide a good indication of catchment health and to reflect the characteristics of that catchment’s water. Where water is diverted above the catchment outlet, then the implications of this should be considered. The Operational Protocols also note that target sites:

End-of-valley targets for Queensland, New South Wales, Victoria and South Australia have been set. The Australian Capital Territory is expected to set a target once appropriate Baseline Conditions have been established.

For all targets in the Basin (other than the Basin Salinity Target at Morgan), the end-of-valley target is based on the median and 80th percentile daily salinity levels and on the mean annual salt load. These are established using the Benchmark Period (1 May 1975 to 30 April 2000), which provides an observed climatic sequence and allows for a range of climatic conditions.

The targets were set with community consultation, using expert advice and analyses of modelling results and other tools.

The Basin Salinity Target at Morgan is for a salinity of 800 EC or less for 95 per cent of the time as modelled over the Benchmark Period.

Baseline Conditions

Baseline Conditions are defined as the agreed suite of conditions in place within the catchments and rivers of the Basin on 1 January 2000. They incorporate:

Modelling is then used to establish the relationship between the Baseline Conditions and the salinity, salt load and flow regime for a given end-of-valley target site. The models are run over the Benchmark Period.

The State Contracting Governments have developed models to simulate the daily salinity, salt load and flow regime at each of the end-of-valley target sites. The models predict the effect of all Accountable Actions and delayed salinity impacts for the years 2015, 2050 and 2100. In this way, the models demonstrate progress against the end-of-valley targets.

In effect, the models predict expected future behaviour based on knowledge of past trends. Table 9 summarises the modelled Baseline Conditions for all end-of-valley target sites. Baseline Conditions are shown as a distribution of the model results:

The models are revised as more data becomes available from the end-of-valley site monitoring. Some sites currently have limited data to support the models.

Table 9. BSMS End-of-Valley Baseline Conditions
Valley Salinity (EC µS/cm) Salt Load (t/yr)Mean Valley Reporting Site AWRC Site Number
Median (50%ile) Peak (80%ile)
VICTORIA
Vic Upper Murray 54 59 150,000 Murray R at Heywoods 409016
Kiewa 47 55 19,000 Kiewa R at Bandiana 402205
Ovens 72 100 54,000 Ovens R at Peechelba–East 403241
Broken 100 130 15,000 Broken Ck at Casey’s Weir 404217
Goulburn 100 150 166,000 Goulburn R at Goulburn Weir 405259
Campaspe 530 670 54,000 Campaspe R at Campaspe Weir 406218
Loddon 750 1,090 88,000 Loddon R at Laanecoorie 407203
Avoca 2,060 5,290 37,000 Avoca R at Quambatook 408203
Wimmera 1,380 1,720 31,000 Wimmera R at Horsham Weir 415200
Vic Riverine Plains 270 380 630,000 Murray R at Swan Hill 409204
Vic Mallee Zone 380 470 1,300,000 Flow to SA 426200
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY
ACT tba tba tba Murrumbidgee R at Hall’s Crossing 410777
NEW SOUTH WALES
NSW Upper Murray 54 59 150,000 Murray R at Heywoods 409016
Lachlan 430 660 250,000 Lachlan R at Forbes (Cottons Weir) 412004
Murrumbidgee 150 230 160,000 Murrumbidgee R d/s Balranald Weir 410130
NSW Riverine Plains 310 390 1,100,000 Murray R at Redcliffs 414204
NSW Border Rivers 250 330 50,000 Macintyre R at Mungindi 416001
Gwydir 400 540 7,000 Mehi R at Bronte 418058
Namoi 440 650 110,000 Namoi R at Goangra 419026
Castlereagh 350 390 9,000 Castlereagh R at Gungalman Bridge 420020
Macquarie 480 610 23,000 Macquarie R at Carinda (Bells Bridge) 421012
Bogan 440 490 27,000 Bogan R at Gongolgon 421023
Barwon–Darling 330 440 440,000 Darling R at Wilcannia Main Channel 425008
NSW Mallee Zone 380 470 1,300,000 Flow to SA 426200
QUEENSLAND
Qld Border Rivers 250 330 50,000 Barwon R at Mungindi 416001#
Moonie 140 150 8,700 Moonie R at Fenton 417204A
Condamine–Balonne 160 210 10,000 Narran R at New Angeldool 422030#
  170 210 5,000 Bohkara R at Hebel 422209A
  170 210 4,200 Ballandool R at Hebel–Bollon Rd 422207A
  150 280 6,500 Briaire Ck at Woolerbilla–Hebel Rd 422211A
  170 210 29,000 Culgoa R at Brenda 422015#
Warrego 101 110 4,800 Warrego R at Barringun No.2 423004#
  100 130 5,500 Cuttaburra Ck at Turra 423005#
Paroo 90 100 24,000 Paroo R at Caiwarro 424201A
SOUTH AUSTRALIA
SA Border 380 470 1,300,000 Flow to SA 426200
Lock 6 to Berri 450 600 1,500,000 Murray R at Lock 4 (Flow) 426514
        Berri Pumping Station (Salinity) 426537
Below Morgan 600 820 1,600,000 Murray R at Murray Bridge 426522
All PARTNER GOVERNMENTS
Murray-Darling Basin 570 920 1,600,000 Murray R at Morgan (Salinity) 426554
    (95%ile)   Murray R at Lock 1 (Flow) 426902

Monitoring

Monitoring stations at the end-of-valley target sites provide data that is used for the assessment of catchment management. Many of the monitoring stations have been upgraded since 2001. It is critical that flow and salinity data is logged continuously as it provides the basis for this assessment. Appendix III provides a record of this data for the 2005–06 year.

Full datasets may not be available at every site because of sub-standard equipment, equipment malfunction or poor quality data, which is rejected. In drier conditions, stream flow can cease. This is common for the ephemeral streams in the northern part of the Basin.

Table 10 provides an aggregated picture of improvements in monitoring for end-of-valley target sites since 2000, while Table 11 shows those sites with less than 95 per cent data availability for the 2005–06 period.

Table 10. Availability of monitoring data by year 2000–06
Year Aggregate % of days with EC records Aggregate % days with Flow and EC records
2000 41% 29%
2001 46% 33%
2002 61% 50%
2003 70% 60%
2004 80% 69%
2005 67% 58%
2006 (to 30 June) 78% 71%

Table 11. Sites with less than 95 per cent data availability for 2005–06
Monitoring Site Measurand No. of days records Per cent of year
Avoca at Quambatook Electroconductivity 0 0%
Loddon at Laanecoorie Electroconductivity 0 0%
Broken at Casey’s Weir Electroconductivity 0 0%
River Murray at Murray Bridge Flow 0 0%
Murray at Redcliffs Flow 0 0%
Campaspe at Campaspe Weir Flow 0 0%
Goulburn at Goulburn Weir Flow 0 0%
Briarie at Woolerbilla–Hebel Rd Electroconductivity 59 16%
Murrumbidgee at Hall’s Crossing Electroconductivity 98 27%
Wimmera at Horsham Weir Electroconductivity 192 53%
Wimmera at Horsham Weir Flow 216 59%
Murray at Redcliffs Electroconductivity 251 69%
Lachlan at Forbes Electroconductivity 271 74%
Lachlan at Forbes Flow 271 74%
Paroo at Caiwarro Electroconductivity 274 75%
Cuttaburra at Turra Electroconductivity 274 75%
Ballandool at Hebel Bollon Rd Electroconductivity 284 78%
Kiewa at Bandiana Electroconductivity 321 88%
Campaspe at Campaspe Weir Electroconductivity 334 92%

4.2 End-of-valley outcomes

Under the BSMS, the jurisdictions monitor flow and salinity data for the end-of-valley target sites and also, where applicable, for interpretation sites (monitoring of salinity for shared rivers or valleys that cross State boundaries). In-stream salinity and salt load for 2005–06 against the long-term records for each site are shown in Tables 12 and 13.

The 2005–06 data continues to reflect the extended dry conditions. In mid- and lower-catchments, the drought has lowered groundwater levels, which has in turn reduced salt accessions to rivers as well as salt on the surface. Less surface salt reduces salt mobilisation occurring through run-off.

Of the existing flows, the proportion sourced from the less saline upper Murray catchments has also been greater, contributing to less saline flows at Morgan.

However, it should be noted that, while these upper Murray flows are relatively less saline than those originating from other parts of the Basin, measured against their own long-term trends, their salinity is relatively higher.

Upon a return to more normal weather conditions like those reflected in the Benchmark Period, salt mobilisation in the landscape is expected to be re-established, thus increasing salt accessions both to the ground surface and directly to the streams.

Targets are statistical expressions of long-term catchment characteristics in the Australian landscape. Climate variability greatly influences short-term outcomes such that annual results should not be assessed against these targets. In other words, annual data does not provide an indication of catchment performance relative to the targets. Variations in rainfall and evaporation are significant drivers of groundwater dynamics, which in turn are the principal determinants of stream salinity. Reporting of annual data needs to be considered in this context.

4.3 Salinity outcomes from Catchment Actions – national investment

At a national level, salinity and water quality are being addressed through the National Action Plan for Salinity and Water Quality (NAP). This joint partnership between the Australian Government and State governments has invested in key catchments to achieve improved management of natural resources.

Regional natural resource management (NRM) plans provide the framework and rationale to invest in the protection of in-valley assets and the maintenance of water supplies for downstream users. Significant funding for the salinity plans has been sourced from the Natural Heritage Trust (NHT) and matched by the State and Territory governments with cash or in-kind work.

During 2005–06, the Australian Government approved $271 million for 56 regions through the regional component of the NHT. The 17 regions within the Murray-Darling Basin used approved investment strategies for specific activities outlined in the regional NRM plans. These plans are managed by regional bodies and address one or more of the NHT targets. Some examples of salinity-related strategies include:

Table 12. Comparison of 2005–06 in-stream salinity (EC) data to long-term statistics
Site1 Length of salinity record (years) EC
50th percentile 80th percentile
2005–06 All data 2005–06 All data
NSW/Victoria shared
Murray at Heywoods 33 48 53 60 59
Victoria
Kiewa at Bandiana 33 48 48 54 59
Ovens at Peechelba East 27 62 69 87 99
Broken Ck at Casey’s Weir 0 na na na na
Goulburn at Goulburn Weir 17 60 77 118 130
Campaspe at Campaspe Weir 16 908 593 933 775
Loddon at Laanecoorie 0 na na na na
Murray at Swan Hill 38 96 254 126 368
Avoca at Quambatook 19 na 4,200 na 8,200
Wimmera at Horsham Weir 14 943 1,265 1,244 1,740
Australian Capital Territory
Murrumbidgee at Hall’s Crossing 16 426 251 492 420
New South Wales
Lachlan at Forbes 7 623 475 704 627
Murrumbidgee at Balranald 40 138 161 197 226
Murray at Redcliffs 39 134 288 157 377
Mehi at Bronte 5 454 498 539 654
Namoi at Goangra 14 358 432 438 582
Castlereagh at Gungalman 5 338 579 636 899
Macquarie at Carinda 14 548 582 640 673
Bogan at Gongolgon 6 318 410 353 635
Darling at Wilcannia 42 457 436 778 874
New South Wales/Queensland shared
Barwon at Mungindi 14 219 261 240 328
Queensland
Moonie at Fenton 3 110 116 156 153
Narran at New Angledool 4 167 141 192 189
Bokhara at Hebel 4 136 169 168 207
Ballandool at Hebel–Bollon Road 4 141 159 213 231
Braire at Woolerbilla–Hebel Road 3 125 60 158 264
Culgoa at Brenda 4 148 151 171 184
Warrego at Barringun 5 0 0 87 138
Cuttaburra at Turra 5 50 92 92 138
Paroo at Caiwarro 2 50 82 92 122
New South Wales/Victoria shared
Murray at Lock 7 (flow) Lock 6 (EC) 44 183 361 202 469
South Australia
Murray at Lock 4 (flow) Berri Pumping Station (EC) 64 235 435 280 594
Murray at Murray Bridge 33 344 570 430 809
Basin Target Site
Murray at Morgan
68 333 558 435 808

1 Sites labelled in italics are for interpretation only. Basin Target Site is marked in bold.

Table 13. Comparison of 2005–06 calculated salt load data to long-term statistics
Site1 Length of both salinity and flow records (years) Mean annual load (tonnes)
2005–06 All data
NSW/Victoria shared
Murray at Heywoods 33 136,700 142,400
Victoria
Kiewa at Bandiana 33 26,800 18,700
Ovens at Peechelba East 27 49,300 48,100
Broken Ck at Casey’s Weir 0 na na
Goulburn at Goulburn Weir 0 na na
Campaspe at Campaspe Weir 0 na na
Loddon at Laanecoorie 0 na na
Murray at Swan Hill 38 152,600 652,000
Avoca at Quambatook 19 na 47,700
Wimmera at Horsham Weir 14 300 21,600
Australian Capital Territory
Murrumbidgee at Hall’s Crossing 16 16,300 52,500
New South Wales
Lachlan at Forbes 7 14,600 123,700
Murrumbidgee at Balranald 40 16,000 90,800
Murray at Redcliffs 23 na 1,235,500
Mehi at Bronte 5 4300 7400
Namoi at Goangra 14 22,700 86,300
Castlereagh at Gungalman 5 8,300 7,000
Macquarie at Carinda 14 1,800 3,400
Bogan at Gongolgon 6 2,300 10,500
Darling at Wilcannia 42 44,800 275,500
New South Wales/Queensland shared
Barwon at Mungindi 14 12,300 57,100
Queensland
Moonie at Fenton 3 2,600 12,400
Narran at New Angledool 4 1,700 4,500
Bokhara at Hebel 4 1,900 2,900
Ballandool at Hebel–Bollon Road 4 500 1,400
Braire at Woolerbilla–Hebel Road 3 Limited data 9,600
Culgoa at Brenda 4 3,600 8,900
Warrego at Barringun 5 2,900 17,900
Cuttaburra at Turra 5 800 27,200
Paroo at Caiwarro 2 3,100 5,900
New South Wales/Victoria shared
Murray at Lock 7 (flow) Lock 6 (EC) 12 151,300 252,400
South Australia
Murray at Lock 4 (flow) Berri Pumping Station (EC) 12 281,700 657,200
Murray at Murray Bridge 0 na na
Basin Target Site
Murray at Morgan
39 371,300 1,604,100

1 Sites labelled in italics are for interpretation only. Basin Target Site is marked in bold.

These activities are critical to the successful implementation of the Basin Salinity Management Strategy. A state-by-state summary is provided below and more detail is available in the partner government annual reports (Appendix IV).

The Australian Government contributed a one-off $500 million cash injection late in the 2005–06 year. For the BSMS, the result is a re-acceleration of some activities, particularly the salt interception schemes’ capital works program.

Queensland

All three NRM regions in the Queensland Murray-Darling Basin have accredited natural resource management plans and approved regional investment strategies. Investment activities are in progress in all three regions.

The investment focus on water quality and salinity related issues in the three regions up to 30 June 2006 totalled $5 million approved through the NAP, and approximately $1.2 million approved through the NHT. The following are examples of activities contributing to salinity management in Queensland:

New South Wales

The investment in water quality and salinity related issues in the NSW part of the Murray-Darling Basin up to 30 June 2006 totalled $124.8 million approved through the NAP and approximately $11.3 million approved through the NHT.

All eight catchment management authorities have developed catchment action plans setting priorities for investment and providing a strategic framework for natural resource management in each region over the next 10 years. The following activities are contributing to salinity management:

Victoria

The investment focus on water quality and salinity related issues in the five regions up to 30 June 2006 totalled $120.7 million approved through the NAP and approximately $3.75 million approved through the NHT. The following activities have been undertaken to support salinity management in Victoria:

South Australia

Within the Murray-Darling Basin area of South Australia, the following projects are contributing to salinity management:

4.4 Programs of Actions by Basin States

Under Schedule C to the Murray-Darling Basin Agreement, the Commission has responsibility for whole-of-Basin outcomes, while the States, in partnership with regions, are responsible for within-valley outcomes. Schedule C requires the partner governments to advise of the Programs of Action being undertaken to meet the established end-of-valley targets.

While formal Programs of Action have not been lodged, the NAP regional NRM plans and the approved investment strategies provide a framework for on-ground activities that are aimed to meet the end-of-valley targets set by the State and endorsed by Ministerial Council.

Activities under the NAP and NHT have been described above. The following is a summary of state actions that will impact on end-of-valley targets.

Queensland

Queensland’s milestones and achievements for 2005–06 encompassed improved salinity information and knowledge, implementation of regional NRM plans and investment strategies, community engagement and capacity building, and significant progress on salinity audits. Modelling capacity and monitoring networks were improved. Milestones included:

New South Wales

The NSW Department of Natural Resources continues to implement the NSW Salinity Strategy. State agencies are working with the catchment management authorities (CMAs) on research, management tools and incentive investment programs for salinity management. NRM management planning and implementation is undertaken by the CMAs, while state-wide targets and auditing of CMA progress in meeting State targets is a function of the NSW Natural Resources Commission.

The 13 NSW CMAs have been working with a broad range of representation across catchments to develop catchment action plans (CAPs). They are also responsible for delivery of the NAP/NHT investment programs.

The prolonged drought has slowed investment programs. Under the Water Management Act 2000, water sharing plans have been gazetted for 13 areas in the NSW part of the Basin. In part, the Act enables water trade and unbundles water licences into access and use rights. Vegetation in NSW managed by the Native Vegetation Act 2003 aims to protect native vegetation, conserve and repair damaged rivers and landscapes, and provide long-term security to farmers. A vehicle for this will be individual property vegetation plans.

Baseline natural resource information is being strengthened under a 10-year Monitoring, Evaluation and Reporting Strategy, including the development of improved monitoring.

The salt transport model IQQM has been enhanced by recalibration following implementation of the water sharing plans. The salinity impacts of water trade in the NSW Mallee have been assessed through the SIMRAT model, using Sunrise 21 and water trade data. New South Wales has encouraged further work on the EM1 model to support assessment of the impact of irrigation on salinity. Development of a holistic picture of irrigation impacts is important, particularly in the Riverine Plains, where water trade is a significant component.

New South Wales is currently completing an update of its component of the 1999 Basin Salinity Audit, which was instrumental in setting interim end-of-valley targets. Early results indicate that, contrary to previous estimation, many catchments are in dynamic equilibrium, with salinity responding to rainfall rather than clearing. More work is necessary to confirm these findings.

Victoria

In collaboration with the regional catchment management authorities, Victorian government agencies continued implementation of land and water management programs aimed at a reduction in salinity impacts. Regional targets are used as key steps in natural resource management. Significant achievements for the year are set out below.

Implementation of an extended Benchmark Period and a new salinity cost function involved a significant commitment by Victoria in the recalculation of entries onto the BSMS Salinity Registers. Planning for, and implementation of, land and water management plans are based on salt disposal entitlements (SDEs), which are allocated to the CMAs, allowing assessment of the impact of their activities on salt export. Victoria is developing regional salinity registers to detail salt disposal activities and these will be aggregated into a State salinity register.

The end-of-valley targets now endorsed by Ministerial Council will be revised in five years in conjunction with regional catchment strategies and salinity management plans. During 2005–06, CMAs assessed the capacity to deliver on-ground change to meet the targets. The work indicated concerns about the level of land use change required to meet current land use targets with current salinity predictions.

Rolling five-year reviews were completed for the Barr Creek Catchment Strategy, Tragowel Plains Surface Drainage, and Shepparton Irrigation Region Catchment Strategy. Reviews of the Register entries for Nangiloc–Colignan and Nyah to the Border have commenced.

Land and water management plans (LWMPs) have continued to be improved for the Mallee, Shepparton Irrigation Region and the Loddon Campaspe. LWMP implementation included protection of native vegetation in dryland areas to control recharge.

Progress has been made on unbundling of water entitlements as part of major reforms in Victoria’s management of its water resources. Water use licences will include provisions to minimise salinity impacts in accordance with LWMPs and will be held in a State Water Register. The water register will support tracking of water trades and accounting for the salinity impacts of these trades. Water use licences and the water register will be introduced in Northern Victoria, including the Riverine Plains, in July 2007.

South Australia

Accountability remains a vital component of the BSMS. South Australia recognises the magnitude of the salinity impacts that are in train within the South Australian Murray-Darling Basin and is committed to ensuring these impacts are offset in the future. Activities during 2005–06 included:

SIS Construction/ Watering on floodplain wetlands/ Monitoring equipment, Mallee Cliffs Disposal Basin

SIS Construction (left), Watering on floodplain wetlands (centre), Monitoring equipment, Mallee Cliffs Disposal Basin (right).
Photo: P. Pfeiffer (left), R. Dawson (centre), A. Reid (right)

< Back | Next >